Sidebar

19
Fri, Jun
சமீபத்திய செய்திகள்

172. Shrinking of the heart during space journey. 

Verse (6:125) of the Quran says the heart of the one who ascends the space shrinks. 

The shrinking of the heart during one’s space journey is practically experienced by people traveling by aircrafts now. But nobody had this knowledge for 1422 years, and they could not have even imagined about space travel..

How could Prophet Muhammad say the heart of the person making a space journey would shrink.at that period of time 1422 years before. This is something only the creator would have had the knowledge of, one more evidence to prove ‘The Quran’ is the word of God. 

To know more please refer to point Nos;304, and 323.      

171. Is slaughtering animals for food justified.

These verses of the Quran (2:173, 5:3, 5:4, 6:118, 6:119, 6:121, 6:145, 11:69, 16:5, 16:14, 16:115, 22:28, 22:36, 23:21, 35:12, 36:72, 40:79, 51:27) man is permitted to slaughter creatures for his food. Some believe this permission to slaughter animals is against compassion for animals. On an in -depth analysis we come to understand the benefits mankind derives from this food habit.

Those who say slaughter of animals for food is cruelty on animals are duty bound to clarify many points regarding this. 

1. Those who term it as cruelty to animals, must explain the use of cattle in agricultural activities ,and other load bearing works the cattles are subjected to. 

2. Those who term it as cruelty to animals, deprive the calves of milk from the mother cow and consume it themselves.Is this not cruelty to the animal in itself.

3. It has been scientifically proven the plants have life.Isn’t then consuming vegetables a cruel action against plants with life.

4. There are millions of living organisms in the water we drink. Isn’t drinking water a cruel action against those living organisms.. 

5. Isn’t killing mosquitoes ,scorpions, snakes by man for selfish reasons a cruel act against such animals. 

Those who say that slaughtering animals for food is cruel need to ponder about man’s act against these.

If the reason given by these people not to consume meat is cruelty, they must spell out the reason for avoiding the meat of dead animals and fishes.

Can the people living in the arctic, where only fish is available survive with this kind of food policy.

These people who avoid meat, consume fish oil for their sharp eyesight.Does their conscience permit this.

Hence the reason put forward by these people citing cruelty to animals is false. 

The intestine and the stomach of humans are organized to digest vegetarian food as well as meat.

If the thinking of men is on these lines, then human reasoning accepts the slaughtering of animals for food . 

Due to the blind following of the beliefs of their ancestors and false reasonings, these people cite cruelty to animals to avoid meat in their food. 

It has been proved scientifically that animals do not suffer any grueling pain ,when they are slaughtered the Islamic way.

The non Muslims who opt for meat food, kill the animals in various ways like drowning them, or wringing their necks, or by beating them with a thick stick ,or killing them with a spear.

Islam reprimands all these kinds of killings of animals for food.It says to slaughter animals by cutting their throats with a very sharp knife,distending the jugular veins that carry blood to the brain.

Because of the blood supply to the brain is cut the animal does not feel much of the pain ,and recent scientific studies show that the slaughtered animals keep kicking not because of pain but due the ejection of blood through the blood vessels of various parts.

A study was conducted by Professor Schultz and his assistant researcher Doctor Hassim of University of Hannover in Germany.

We give below the details of their study.

1) The animals to be slaughtered were selected..

2) By surgery electronic receptors were inserted in many parts of their brain. 

3) Once they gained conscious they were left alone for many weeks.

4) Then half the animals were slaughtered the Islamic way.

5) The other half were handled the western type of stunning and killed. 

6).All the animals were analyzed for their EEG, and ECG recordings.

Now let’s look into the test results and explanations.

When the animals were slaughtered the Islamic Halal way there were no changes in the EEG recordings for the first three seconds proving the animals did not suffer any pain during slaughter with recordings without any changes.

2) The next three seconds the EEG recorded a deep unconsciousness or a deep sleep state of the animal, that was due to the ejection of the blood in high pressure.

3) At the end of six seconds the EEG recorder did not register any signal signifying no pain or torture by the animal. 

4) Though the EEG recorder did not register any signal, and because of the continuous beating of the heart, and the pulsating actions of the body, the blood is being let out making the meat hygenic to be consumed by humans.

The western type of stunning the animals before slaughtering yielded the following results in the study.They suffered great pain was evident from the EEG recording.

1) The animals that are subjected to the method of killing by stunning are immediately rattled, and thrown off balance and enter a stage where they become unconscious.

2) At this stage the EEG recorded signals that the animals were experiencing severe pain.

3) At the same time the heart of animals stunned come to a standstill immediately when compared to that of halal way slaughtered ones, rendering the meat not hygienic enough to eat because the blood of the animals stays within the organs and flesh of the animal..The above cited studies prove the halal way of slaughtering is the best and also humane.

Hence it is proved the slaughtering of animals for food is not inhumane or a torture to animals.

Now the question arises why the animals that are not slaughtered in the name of Allah not to be consumed? 

Generally no one can create an organism, even if the whole world comes together cannot create a single ant, and hence no body has the right to take the life of another being.

But if the same Allah who created these beings permits us to slaughter for food, there would be no regrets of doing so. But if we are to use this permission given to us by Allah, every time an animal is slaughtered we need His permission. 

This permission is ‘Bismillah’ meaning slaughtering being done ‘in the name Allah’

The message to be understood here is “ Oh, God I am taking the life of a being not because I want it to be decimated, You are the one who created this creature and since You permitted I am slaughtering this .I am not the one to kill lives.

This kind of undertaking is the permission to slaughter.If it is not declared that the slaughtering is being done in the name of ‘Allah’ then it amounts to not getting permission from the owner of that life, leading to a crime being committed..

If we steal the goat of a person we know it amounts to theft -a crime. That person is the owner only to the meat of the animal. But it is necessary to get the permission of the owner of the life of the animal before it is killed.

Generally, one who is used to the practice of flashing a knife turns out at a later stage to be a ruffian getting involved in all kinds of unlawful activities, but the one who slaughters goats and sheep or cattle do not turn out to be one such person. The reason being “Bismillah”

It keeps reminding him that because of the permission granted by God ,he is slaughtering the animals everyday and that the same God did not permit him to kill men and hence he would not do it. 

There is yet another benefit accruing of this.There are preferences in eating habits of people who consume bird or animal meat.

If we sell a slaughtered animal or bird to somebody who dislikes it, it amounts to a big fraud on him.We have come across people offering the meat of crow as that of chicken and that of dog as the meat of goat.

People are deceived for following their food habits by others to make money.

A muslim who ventures to slaughter an animal in the name of God would dare not call beef as mutton to make money. He would dare not slaughter animals or birds like dogs, pigs and crows that are prohibited in Islam.

By slaughtering in the name of God by saying Bismillah this is the extra benefit earned by man to stay on the side of truth.

 This is one of the reasons Muslims are required to say ‘Bismillah’ when beginning to slaughter animals and birds.This reason is derived from our thinking, and more such reasons may be found. To know more about why fish can be eaten without being slaughtered and why dead fish are eaten, refer point No;505.

170. Not to abuse what others worship.

Verse (6:108) of the Quran says not to abuse,revile what others worship...

Islam stands firm in the basic ideology of monotheism.

Islam holds on to the steadfast belief that, all others being worshipped in place of God are nothing but figment of imagination of men.

Even then Islam does not endorse criticizing or abusing other beliefs or other gods of other people. 

However hard the non muslims try into a confrontation, muslims are supposed not to abuse others gods.

At the same time debating intellectually the existence of One God and there can never be many does not amount to talking ill of other gods. Verses 3:64, 3:79, 4:171, 5:72, 5:73, 6:71, 6:100, 6:108, 9:31, 12:39, 12:40, 13:16, 16:51, 17:22, 17:111, 21:22, 21:24, 23:91, 23:117 of the Quran talks regarding this aspect. To know more about the stand of Islam on the places of worship, and gods of others refer to explanation points 432, 433, 473.

169. The high literary grace of ‘The Quran’ 

When Prophet Muhammad introduced the Quran, the people in those days were wondering at its literary grace.And they believed strongly that it could not be the handiwork of an illiterate man. 

And they were hesitant to disclose, the Quran was from the Almighty.

They said the Quran is being tutored to the Prophet through some well learned person verse (6:105) 

The answer to this critique can be found in verse (16:103) of the Quran. We have explained the same in explanation point No;142.

168. The blind person, and the indifference of Prophet Muhammad.

Chapter 80 of the Quran in its verses (80:1-12) presents us a historical event, about Abdullah son of Ummu Maqdum, a blind person, who was looked down upon because of his blindness during those days, and one of the first reverts to Islam 

He greets Prophet Muhammad with a ‘Salam’ on his way while the Prophet was in conversation with members belonging to a higher clan.

Prophet Muhammad frowned at him because Abdullah intervened at a time he was conversing with members of a higher clan.

The blind person’ would not have definately aware of the frowning or Prophet Muhammad’s attitude towards him.

But immediately there is a warning from the Almighty in the form of Quranic verses.

Allah addresses Prophet Muhammad thus “ You are ignoring by frowning on this person just because of the presence of people of a higher clan”. The blind person was aware of this only after the revelation of this verse.

This reveals a truth to us.

Had Prophet Muhammad been the author of The Quran, it is not possible that he passes strictures against himself in the same Quran he is alleged to be the author.

If he was the author of the Quran he would not have dared to pass strictures against himself in it, taking into consideration the reaction of people who would read the Quran in the years to come. 

Because the Quran is from the Almighty, the prophet openly declares to the people who hold him in high esteem, that Allah has reprimanded him.

We can take this as an intellectual proof to declare ‘The Quran’ as the word of God.

Moreover it could be understood that, though being the messenger of Allah, the Prophet cannot by himself do anything that displeases the Creator.

And again this is a proof that Allah renders justice not on the basis of the person who commits an act but on the kind of an act committed. 

We need to ponder the kind of religion we are in, where Allah reprimands His messenger for his reaction towards an ordinary blind person. Think of the benefits mankind would gain by the ideology of such a religion.

We can also find in history after this event ,Prophet Muhammad being courteous towards that person. 

Everyone is equal by birth and only by their actions is one considered higher or lower, and to know more about equality and brotherhood in Islam refer explanation points 11, 32, 49, 59, 141, 182, 227, 290, 368, 508.

167. The place of stay and the place to be handed over to. 

Verse (6:98) of the Quran refers to ‘The place of stay’ as the earth and the ‘place to hand over’ as the grave is easily understood. 

But the sentence ‘Place to hand over’ used in the Quran discloses a much wider truth. 

Man is born on this earth as a tiny being.And then he grows to a much bigger person in shape and size by taking in nutrients from plants and animals on this earth. And then he passes out of this world.. 

Man grows bigger by his intake of nutrients in grains and pulses and others from the earth.Thus he is reducing the burden of the earth.

So, when a person weighing 50 kilos lived , he has taken the 50 kilos burden off the earth, and he owes the 50 kilos of matter to the place where he picked it up from.

The message here is, man becomes a belonging of the earth, where he needs to be returned to or handed over to.Man does not directly consume the soil of the earth, but in turn consumes the products grown on the soil, transforming the same into his body. Allah has aptly mentioned in the Quran where man has to be handed back over to.

Please refer to explanation point No;331 for more details regarding the same subject

166. Life in the grave- a world of spirits.

There are numerous hadiths by Prophet Muhammad that say about the good enjoying peace and the evil being tormented in the world of spirits (the grave). And Muslims believe this. 

But some cite the absence of any mention regarding this in the Quran and deny the same.

Though The Quran does not make direct mention of this, Prophet Muhammad’s sayings are sufficient enough for us to understand the same. But the truth is, Quran does talk about the torment faced by the evil in the world of spirits.(in the grave) 

Verse (6:93),and (8:50), of the Quran say, when the angels take hold of the souls of the evil they would say” Today you taste the torment in disgrace.

An evil person does not go straight to hell on his death. Only after the whole world is destroyed, and after being judged on the ‘Day of Judgment” will he suffer the disgraceful torment.

But this verse says while the soul is being taken hold of “Today suffer the disgraceful torment” The torment referred to here is the one suffered by the evil as soon as they are dead and takes place in the grave. And Prophet Muhammad has already mentioned this, and is not against the Quran.

165. The angels that take hold of the souls of humans.

(4:97, 6:61, 6:93, 7:37, 8:50, 16:28, 16:32, 32:11, 47:27, 79:1,2) These verses of the Quran talk about angels that take hold of the souls of humans. 

Tamil Muslims widely believed that Allah has appointed an angel by the name of Israeeil to take hold of the souls of humans at the time of their death. 

But there is no indication either in the Quran or in the sayings of Prophet Muhammad about the existence of an angel in that name. 

And there is no kind of proof to be shown that only one angel takes hold of the souls of all men.

But the verse (32:11) of the Quran says there is one angel assigned to take hold of each person’s soul.

When it comes to talk of multitudes of souls to be taken hold it says “Their souls will be taken hold by the angels”.This can be seen in verses ( 4:97, 6:93, 8:50, 16:28, 16:32, 47:27) of the Quran.

Verses 6:61 and 7:37 of the Quran say “ Our messengers will take hold of their souls” in plural.

Hence the belief that all souls would be taken hold of by a single angel is a fallacy. 

Allah has assigned one angel each for a person to take hold of his soul,waiting every second for the command from Him,This is the message that we get from the Quran and Prophet Muhammad’s explanation.

There is no substantiation for the belief that a single angel is assigned the task of taking hold of the souls of all humans of the world. 

More Articles …